blackhawkxx Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 Someone ask me this question and I have a carbed bike and thought you guys would be the best to answer: Have not seen many people swapping over to a 4-1 system on the bike--mostly slip ons. I'm guessing that's because Honda has a Closed Loop analysis system on the FI bikes and there's no place available on aftermarket pipes to incorporate the Oxygen sensor. Imagine this tends to make the bike run "sour" when compared to the stock fuel ratio mixing. Am I right about that?? However there was on the board a picture of the internals of the stock exhauust showing not only the restrictions internally but also the sharp bends the exhaust gases have to make on their way out. This surely restricts performance of the bike in this stock condition. So what is the cure for this dilemma?? Your carb'ed bike is different--but what have you heard about the FI bikes. Does most everyone go with the slip ons because of the lack of a 4-2 performance system or is it the O2 sensor deal that the exhaust manufactures don't want to address this issue?? Input, thoughts, knowledge please. It would be Very Helpful to get some enlightenment on this area. The Hayabusa is an open loop system and you can put on a performance exhaust and with Yoshimura's software remap the complete fueling system from 0-14,000RPM. This would seem to be a BIG advantage to me when searching for a big more "get up and go". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demon Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 My bike is a 99 model "49 state bike" and is Fuel Injected. Only California bikes get the oxygen sensor and I don't know of anyone who makes a full system with dual pipes. I have a 4-2-1 Akrapovic on mine and love it. Sometimes I wish I had slipons just for the looks of them. When I bought my bike used, it already had the exhaust on it. If it were stock, I would have probably went with the MIG's. The Suzuki's ECM is reprogramable with a Yoshimura box, unlike ours. We need a Powercommander to help out our fuel and ignition. My bike has no provision or wiring for an oxygen sensor, so I guess the bike runs in an "open loop" like a busa. I'm like you, the stock exhaust looks really restrictive to me in the collector area and where the pipes split into the dual pipes. Slipon mufflers can't help help this restriction out, but will help with a less restrive muffler. The biggest advantage to aftermarket slipons, I can figure, is the weight reduction and the improved looks of the cans. My exhaust header and collector area has NO restrictions. Straight flow into the collector and muffler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBRXX Posted May 28, 2004 Share Posted May 28, 2004 On the '02 model year in the USA, only the CA models have the O2 sensor. Not sure about the '03 or other years. Of course, you could always have a bung welded onto any aftermarket exhaust to utilize the sensor. Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beltwaybob Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 Mine's also a '99, no sensor. I put a Micron full system on (4 into 2 into 1). Dynoed it with a PC II at Fast Lane Cycles. It didn't show that much gain in hp or torque on the chart but I notice overall improvement, especially from about 4000 to 8000 rpm. I'm lazy, I don't often downshift. That's why I love the XX. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackhawkxx Posted May 29, 2004 Author Share Posted May 29, 2004 Thanks guys. I will pass on the information. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hrc4u Posted May 29, 2004 Share Posted May 29, 2004 i have a "european" bird version with the O2 sensor.. i recently bought a full Akra 4-1, and that system has a place for the O2 sensor! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.