I find it curious what a debate this has become. Most AFM racers(in Norcal) that ride Hondas use either Lindemann or Dan Kyle.Warchilds perspective comes from the experience of close to 250 very satisfied customers at www.fireblades.org---NOT one has had an issue with their forks. There are MANY stories of people having there forks done by others---or doing it themselves with very substandard results. On the XX you may not even notice these as you are not pushing the enevelope as one would on the racetrack---go to an AFM race and try to find Racetech valves in a racebike-you wont find very many--I wonder why?---Although I respect Mirths skills/experience---I havent heard hundreds of awesome reviews of his forks. For example---one of the really big issues with Honda forks is there suseptibility to stiction--I hear no mention of this in any XX threads. Furthermore---No one has seen a "picture" of these valves---why would you buy something sight unseen---One of the uses with "big valves" is high loading chatter. The fluid dynamics behind valve sizing/performance are of the variety of a 5th order differential equation. Ohlins/Showa spends a ton of R&D researching these---so the bigger is better philosphy aint that simple or everyone, especially Ohlins would be using it---and I gaurantee it aint present in the beloved Ohlins rear shock.
My buddy did his own 929 forks with Rcatech valving(both comp/rebound) and was NOT a happy camper---he went straight to Ohlins after that and was quite happy. He has ridden my 929 and says that it is loads better than the Racetech setup. I push my 929 to mid-pack AFM times and have yet to notice any performance limitations of the forks than Dan Kyle rebuilt---ie NO chatter, no understeer/over steer, wierd tire behaviour, etc. I know numerous RC51/929/954 users that have the same Dan Kyle rebuilt forks with the same results.
What I find interesting is that everyone seems to ignore the Moriwaki RC51 link that Dan has has such good results with---and has worked its way into the production RC51----yet Max/others pooppo this as a "work of fiction".
I am not trying to promote anyones specific agenda here--I encourage all to make a very informed decision.
Below is a rather interesting review of the "fork issue" from a pretty respectable indiviual that has spent along time racing Hondas
"There seems to be much discussion of hydra-lock on Max's part, yet no one has discussed cavitation in that entire debacle. In a sealed space as long as there is air, force, movement and fluid, there will be cavitation and the larger holes will allow the "air charged" fluid to percolate whereas with the smaller holes, the cavitation factor will be reduced through an increased straining effect. As LTL pointed out, the valve face contour will have a profound impact on damping reaction time as well as efficiency as the face of the valve has to slice through the fluid wall as the suspension moves in and out. Most of these valves wouldn't last 10 seconds on a flow bench, so I wonder how their fluid dynamics rate from one type to another???
At any rate, methinks Max said a lot last year when he admitted that he rarely get's on the WERA board until he's "had a few . . .".
Review of Stock/DK,Ohlins
http://www.fireblades.org/forums/arcmessag...=ohlins%20forks