spEEdfrEEk
-
Posts
708 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by spEEdfrEEk
-
-
CATEGORY: biology/anabolism
TECHNICAL: ***
SUMMARY:
This document talks about post-exercise response,
and one method for aiding in post-workout recovery. It's
a bit technical, but most people who train will understand
the reasoning behind it. I send it in response to a previous
article which suggested that protein, alone, was the most
important factor aiding recovery after training. As you will see
as you read through it, there are many hormones involved, and
timing is crucial. I've used this technique before (about
2 years ago), but found it to be not much more beneficial
than just carbing 1-2 times a week after training low-carb.
The main reason I no longer use it _all_ the time is the fact
that post-workout glucose blunts the effectiveness of the massive
increase in NK cells which could be used to advantage with the proper
supplementation of AFA algae. In fact, I plan to try this
new theory (with AFA post-workout) on myself to see what, if
any, immune benefits it may have.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 18:01:23 -0400
Subject: Insulin, GH, and IGF
The following is a brief explanation of what happens to the muscle
tissue during exercise and post-exercise. During a bout of exercise
catabolic responses cause the proteins and muscle tissue to be broken
down. Obviously the higher the intensity of the exercise the more
catabolic the response will be. Meaning the more protein and muscle
tissue is broken down while exercising. During the exercise phase there
are loses in vitamins, minerals as well as increases in the adrenal
production of catecholamines and glucocorticiods. So cortisol increases,
glucagon increases, and insulin decreases. Thus, protein tissue
degradation increases and protein synthesis decreases or stops while in
the exercise phase.
Immediately after exercise in the post-exercise phase, a restorative
rebound in the naturally occurring anabolic hormones occurs. These
hormones include insulin, growth hormone (GH), IGF, pineal and thymic
factors, as well as the steroid hormones testosterone, DHEA, and
estrogens. This post-exercise response is also known as biochemical or
metabolic supercompensation. During this supercompensation period HIGH
LEVELS of these anabolic hormones, particularly INSULIN, GH, and IGF, are
NECESSARY during close post-exercise restorative phase to provide MAXIMAL
PROTEIN SYNTHESIS. High levels of these same hormones are also necessary
to restore the negative metabolic effect created by catecholamines and
glucocorticiods produced during exercise. It should be noted that
testosterone is not involved in the earlier stages of post-exercise as the
hormones insulin, GH, and IGF. Testosterone usually appears during later
phases of post-workout recovery. So this tells us that immediately
following a bout of exercise, there will be an increase in the production
of both GH and INSULIN. Both INSULIN and GH ARE very necessary for
optimal protein synthesis.
In summary, it should be easily understood now that the rebound
effect or rises in the anti-catabolic hormones insulin, growth hormone
(GH), IGF, pineal and thymic factors, occur immediately after exercise is
stopped. The steroid hormones testosterone, DHEA, and estrogens naturally
start to occur later in the post-exercise phase. The combination of these
hormonal actions stops the protein and muscle degradation caused by
catabolic hormones produced during exercise and starts protein synthesis
after exercise. It should also be noted that literature does support the
theory that INSULIN and GH both INCREASE protein synthesis in combination
with several other natural occurring hormones. In fact, insulin rebound
is required for the release of GH, which in turn releases IGF. It should
also be noted once again that synthesis will not be able to occur if there
is not a sufficient supply of energy (as in calories) or insufficient free
amino acid pools. Many of these sources revealed as I had previously
recommended, that amino acid or protein supplements with some added carbs,
taken within 2 hours post-exercise, while insulin, growth hormone (GH),
IGF, pineal and thymic factors are high, further aids in createing a
beneficial environment during recovery by further increasing these hormone
levels. The addition of dietary carbohydrate causes increases insulin
production, which further increases GH release, which in turn, further
increases the release of IGF. These increases, have been shown to further
increase protein synthesis and muscle growth after a bout of exercise as
well as increasing the uptake of free amino acids. By adding amino acids
immediately after exercise, we have further increased the available free
amino acid pool needed for growth. So without the insulin rebound after
exercise, the body would remain in a catabolic state .
How much of each would I recommend? 20-25 g of protein with 50-100 g of
carbohydrate the first 15-30 minutes after training.
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Redd....to properly evaluate your situation...we would need un-clothed photos of your upper body. :razz:
You have strokes of brilliance at times, you know that bud?
:wink: TJ :wink:
-
Reminds me of my recipe for elephant stew..
1 Medium elephant, diced into 1/2 inch cubes
salt/pepper to taste..
TJ
-
CATEGORY: diets/paleo
TECHNICAL: **
SUMMARY:
This document is another that illustrates the incredible
importance of avoiding man-made processed foods. It is the
basis for some of the things I have told many of ya'll about.
It points out, early on, one thing that I have begun to notice
as of late. If you look at photos of people taken in the
first half of this century (or earlier), you'll most likely
notice that people tended to get lighter/smaller and lose weight
as they aged. Today, however, it is a common fact that people
will gain weight as they age..
One of the most interesting things about this note is
the discussion of the Kitava study. Keep in mind that these
people smoke all of their lives practically but, yet, do not
suffer from CVD nearly as much as we do here in the US. In
fact, the article reports them as "lean" even though a significant
portion of their diet is "coconut" which is the most saturated
(natural) fat source there is. As some of you know, I advocate
the consumtion of coconut (if you can tolerate it) because
it does boost metabolism.
This most ironic thing is the last paragraph which
describes a "western-ized" Kitava individual. After exposure
to the western diet, he too started to experience the same
difficulties plaguing America today. So you see, there's nothing
"genetic" about CVD, diabetes, obesity, etc..
-------------------------------------------------------------
On the Benefits of Ancient Diets
The fact that man is an OMNIVOROUS HUNTER-GATHERER is sometimes taken
as an argument that western foods would be without adverse health effects.
But then an important point is missed: For a typical Westerner at least
70% of calories are provided by foods that were practically unavailable
during human evolution, namely dairy products, oils, margarine, refined
sugar and cereals. These typical western foods are low in minerals,
vitamins and soluble fibre but high in fat and salt. There is much
evidence indicating that some of these dietary factors are important
causes of common western disorders like CORONARY HEART DISEASE, STROKE and
DIABETES which furthermore appear absent or rare in populations pursuing a
traditional subsistence lifestyle.
Every traditional population so far studied has, after adopting the
western lifestyle, developed a more or less typical western morbidity
pattern where cardiovascular diseases play the dominant role.
Fully developed ATHEROSCLEROSIS of the coronary vessels of the heart
is part of normal ageing in westernized populations but has not been
demonstrated in other free-living mammals. Every studied case of mature
atherosclerosis in animals (laboratory animals, domestic swine etc) has
been proceeded by a diet which is not eaten by the animal in its natural
context. Among lifestyle interventions it is only dietary changes that has
been shown to lead to regression of atherosclerosis.
It is apparently only in westernized humans that ageing is
accompanied by increased WEIGHT and BLOOD PRESSURE as well as several
other alterations.
CANCER rates may have been low due to a high intake of fruits and
vegetables which apparently prevent some common forms of cancer in western
populations.
Expectedly, hunter-gatherers would furthermore be protected from
OSTEOPOROSIS, another modern epidemic, since their lifestyle implies lots
of walking, much sunlight and plenty of vegetables fairly rich in calcium
that was highly available due to the low cereal intake. The low sodium
intake would probably minimize renal losses of calcium. Some data indicate
higher bone mass in ancient human skeletons, although osteoporotic
fractures are commonly found in archeological Eskimo skeletons.
As for children, the possible absence of RICKETS in preagricultural
skeletons, its apparent increase during medieval urbanization and its
epidemic explosion during industrialism can hardly be explained only in
terms of decreasing exposure to sunlight. An additional possible cause is
an increasing inhibition of calcium absorption by phytate from cereals
which took increasingly greater part during the Middle Ages, and since old
methods of reducing the phytate content such as dampening and
heat-treatment may have been lost during the emergence of large-scale
cereal processing.
IN CONCLUSION, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, diabetes,
osteoporosis, rickets and other common western diseases can probably to a
large extent be prevented by diets resembling those of hunter-gatherers.
THE KITAVA STUDY
Against the above background we have made a survey on cardiovascular
disease incidence and related risk factors among 2300 subsistence
horticulturists in the tropical island of Kitava, Trobriand Islands, Papua
New Guinea. Semi-structured interviews concerning disease patterns were
performed among 213 Kitavans aged 20-96 years. Age estimations were based
on known historic events as reference.
Our most important findings so far published are that sudden cardiac
death, stroke and exertion-related chest pain were non-existent or
extremely rare in Kitavans. Infections, accidents, complications of
pregnancy and senescence were the most common causes of death. All adults
had low diastolic blood pressure (all below 90 mm Hg) and were very lean
(weight decreased after age 30), while serum cholesterol was somewhat less
favourable, probably due to a high intake of saturated fat from coconut.
Tubers, fruit, fish and coconut were dietary staples in Kitava. The
intake of western food and alcohol was negligible. Saturated fat intake
from coconut was high (mainly lauric and myristic acid), and the estimated
proportions of energy derived from total, saturated, monounsaturated and
polyunsaturated fatty acids were 21, 17, 2 and 2% of dietary energy (en%)
compared with 37, 16, 16 and 5 en% in Sweden. The intake of n-3 PUFA,
soluble fibre, minerals and vitamins was high, while salt intake
approximated 40-50 mmol/24h, as compared to 100-250 in the West.
The level of physical activity was roughly estimated at 1.7 multiples
of the basal metabolic rate, which is slightly higher than the levels of
sedentary western populations. Eighty per cent of both sexes were daily
smokers, supporting the concept that smoking alone is not sufficient to
cause cardiovascular disease. Our survey methods preclude any speculation
as to the role of psychosocial factors.
The only available migrant was a 44 year-old urbanized businessman
who had grown up on Kitava and who came for a visit during our survey. He
differed markedly from all other adults regardless of sex: he had the
highest diastolic blood pressure (92 mm Hg), the highest body mass index
(28 kg/m2) and the highest waist to hip ratio (1.1), indicating that
Kitavans are not genetically protected from hypertension or abdominal
obesity.
IN CONCLUSION, the virtual absence of cardiovascular disease in
Kitava further emphasizes the potential of its prevention. Among the
analysed cardiovascular risk factors, leanness and low diastolic blood
pressure appeared to be the most important modifiable ones in this
population. Our findings are supported by clinical experience by three
medical doctors working in the Trobriand Islands since the 1960s.
1. Lindeberg S. Apparent absence of cerebrocardiovascular disease in
Melanesians. Risk factors and nutritional considerations - the Kitava
Study [M.D. Ph.D.]. University of Lund, 1994.
2. Lindeberg S, Lundh B. Apparent absence of stroke and ischaemic heart
disease in a traditional Melanesian island: a clinical study in Kitava. J
Intern Med 1993; 233: 269-75.
3. Lindeberg S, Nilsson-Ehle P, Terént A, Vessby B, Scherstén B.
Cardiovascular risk factors in a Melanesian population apparently free
from stroke and ischaemic heart disease - the Kitava study. J Intern Med
1994; 236: 331-40.
4. Lindeberg S, Vessby B. Fatty acid composition of cholesterol esters and
serum tocopherols in Melanesians apparently free from cardiovascular
disease - the Kitava study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 1995; 5: 45-53.
5. Lindeberg S, Nilsson-Ehle P, Vessby B. Lipoprotein composition and
serum cholesterol ester fatty acids in non-westernized Melanesians. Lipids
1996; 31: 153-8.
6. Lindeberg, Berntorp E, Carlsson R, Eliasson M, Marckmann P. Haemostatic
variables in Pacific Islanders apparently free from stroke and ischaemic
heart disease - The Kitava Study. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77: 94-8.
7. Lindeberg S, Berntorp E, Nilsson-Ehle P, Terént A and Vessby B. Age
relations of cardiovascular risk factors in a traditional Melanesian
society: the Kitava Study. AJCN 1997;66:845-52.
8. Srikumar TS, Källgård A, Lindeberg S, Öckerman PA, Åkesson B.Trace
element concentration in hair of subjects from two South Pacific islands,
Atafu (Tokelau) and Kitava (Papua New Guinea). J Trace Elem Electrolytes
Health Dis 1994; 8: 21-6.
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Mostly because we would hate to see your new avitar :shock:
Cool! Thanks for givin' me an idea for my new avatar!
(kiddin')
:razz: TJ :razz:
-
He's a fecking NASA rocket scientist... Dude probably takes a laptop into the gym.
ha ha ha, how did you guess!?!? Kidding...
Nothing but love for my nerdy brother! :razz:I know bro, I know.. :wink:
I'm sure that'a great program, but the first time I read it I was like WOOOAH... to many calculations and too much to keep track of.Mine is way easier for a dummy to remember! LOL
Hey, if you got something that works -- go with it! I'm all about
_results_ and you're obviously gettin' em :grin:
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Hello TJ,
Do you keep a log of all your workouts?
Yep!
That is way to much data to keep track of properly in your head.What does your log look like?
Pretty much what you see there.. With the exception that there
is only one day per page..
(do you use a spread sheet, or some type of pre-printed form, or do you just have a notebook with some type of notation that you jot down that you can understand?)Yep.. Little spiral notebook in my gym bag. The notation is identical
to above. The only difference is that weights are written in and not
percentages.. The "+reps | +weight" scheme works well for me.
Each time I go up a rep, I add one to the count.. Each time I increase
the weight I add to the weight column and set the rep count back to
zero..
How often do you test your 1 rep max in order to calculate your percentages? Maybe...every 12 weeks or so?I only compute my 1RM when I start a new exercise or use a new
machine, etc. After that. I just continue to update my progress
incrementally. In general, you know what your 1RM is, because if
you keep records properly you can make a guess (just extrapolate
to 100% from 85%, etc..)
I'd be glad to explain anything in further detail if you'd like, just
ask..
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
I really need to increase my upper body strength and endurance, but I dont want to get too cut.
The two are practically mutually exclusive.. Only someone who
is a beginner can gain power and "get cut" at the same time.
By "getting cut" are we talking about losing boobs? -- that's more
diet related..
Strength ONLY comes from increasing resistance. "Getting cut",
or "Getting bigger" is more of a diet factor than a training factor.
Bodybuilders and powerlifters do similar regimes, with the exception
of "impulse" type lifts. The bodybuilder will typically eat MUCH more
in the way of calories, and the powerlifter will typical do more sets
of 2-3 reps at 90-95% max.
Heavier weights, less reps? I was using lighter weights with more reps, but this isnt increasing strength, as much as I would have hoped.That's because you are not stressing a muscle, but only fatiguing it
when you increase reps.
The best way to improve strength is to use the rep schemes I suggested
in my "power program" post. 6-9 reps at 85% max weight, 12-16
reps at 70% max weight, and 24-36 reps at 45% max weight.
That hits all 3 types of muscle fibers, and they will respond by growing
stronger. (you can avoid plateus by varying the angle of attack on
a muscle as I suggested in the same previous post.)
I used heavier weights last night and today I can barely wipe my ass, I am so sore.And now you will grow as you recover. (consume enough protein or
you will overtrain -- 30% of your calories in proteins..)
And what is the deal with this? Some people I talk to say that you SHOULD be sore, and others say that you should never be sore at all.You will be sore if you do it right.. The longer you do it, the faster the
soreness will go away. I've been training for 7 years now, and I still
get quite sore. I'm totally healed in about 1/2 a day though. Using
the scheme I mentioned, I was able to more than triple my strength.
I do alternate my upper body and lower body workout, but I am finding that I usually experience my sorest time the second day after landing on the day that I work that area out again. Could this be hindering any progress?You should only use a muscle group once a week. It can take up to
96 hours for a large group (IE: quads, triceps, glutes, etc.) to recover.
As I mentioned earlier, I only use a group in exactly the same way
once a month. Each week I'll hit a group, but from a different angle
than the previous week.. This provides for maximum power development
and maximum recovery at the same time.
Split your workouts into 3 sessions: lower body, upper body, and
midsection. Try to put a full day in between each lifting session for
recovery and get lazy during off times as much as possible.
Increase your caloric intake to 15 kcal/lb. for your lean body weight.
Don't worry, Pee Wee Herman has more of a chance at "getting big"
than you do, because you have no testicles :wink:
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
I'm running a DynoJet Stage 1 Kit, Jardines RT-One Carbon
Slipons, and a K&N aerocharger air filter.
I'm in Houston, which is at sealevel and has a mean temp of about
80 deg. F.
DJ142 Mains (one size up from default)
Clips 3rd from the top (default)
#40 Pilots (one size down from stock)
Pilot screws 2.5 turns out (stock)
It makes 5+ peak horsepower over stock, more in other areas..
Great torque curve too..
If you don't wanna spend money on the pilots, you
can use the stock #42 and set the pilots at 1.5 turns out
(but it'll run a bit rich up to 4K RPM)
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
There's caffeine in that?
Tons.. In fact, most Japanese families drink it daily, but
are afraid to give it to their children (taboo) because they
feel the caffeine can stunt growth..
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Paleolithic Cave Art Evolutionary Fitness
What Evolution Teaches Us About How to Live and Stay Healthy
Copyright ©1995 by
Arthur De Vany, Ph.D..
Essay
This essay is an extended summary of my research project exploring
what the evolutionary evidence tells us about how to stay fit and young.
My aim is to contribute to an evolutionary physiology and science of
exercise. It combines my experience as a professional and amateur
athlete, and as someone who has spent more than 40 years exercising, with
my scientific interests in evolution and complex adaptive systems. It
begins with the premise that our bodies and minds are adapted to an
ancient environment that passed more than 10,000 years ago. We evolved as
hunter-gatherers over at least three million years and that lifeway
shapes our attributes, behaviors, and capabilities as human beings. It is
by understanding the hunter-gatherer adaptation and incorporating the
activity and eating patterns of our ancestral lifeway that we can live a
natural and healthy life in a modern world that is very different from
the one in which human beings evolved.
In developing this idea, I take the Darwinian approach that has been
so successful in the new fields of evolutionary psychology and medicine
and apply it to physical fitness. This book will integrate what is known
of the conditions of our ancestral existence, what is known of the
lifestyles of the living hunter-gatherers, and the new sciences of
complex adaptive systems with modern research on metabolism and
physiology to find an effective model of a healthy lifestyle.
When the body is viewed as a far from equilibrium, complex adaptive
system exploiting evolved mechanisms, it becomes clear that conventional
thinking about diets and obesity is wrong. I argue that the evolutionary
evidence and modern research shows that high intensity, intermittent
training (activities that are personally challenging, but so brief as to
not promote exhaustion) combined with walking and playful activities is
the most productive form of exercise for any person of any age or sex.
Such exercise is productive because it is more like the activities
that were essential to the emergence and evolution of the human species.
High intensity, intermittent and brief training mixed with power walking
and play is closer than aerobic exercise, high volume weight training, or
sedentism to how our ancestors lived. Our brains and bodies are dynamic
objects and they thrive on challenge and movement; intensity brings key
adaptations in body composition and power and play integrates mind and
body.
We differ in no significant ways from our large and powerfully
muscled ancestors of the last Ice Age. We are hunter-gatherers and have
been for all of human and pre-human history. Only 15,000 years have
passed since the last Ice Age, not long enough for bodies suited for the
sedentary modern age to have evolved. If such bodies ever do evolve they
cannot have our minds, for the human mind lives in a brain adapted to an
energetic, versatile and dynamic body.
What follows is a sketch of ideas that are developed more fully in the
book.
Evolution of the Human Body and Mind
The story of human evolution is one of adaptation in a patchy and
dangerous environment. We are generalists, not specialists, and that is
why we are adaptive two-legged omnivores with broad territorial range,
small stomachs and big brains. Humans embarked on a risky strategy for
survival: we "chose" to live by our wits by exploiting a wide territory
and many foods along with opportunistic capture of high nutrient, but
fugitive and random, food sources. We lived virtually all of the 3 or so
million years of human and prehuman history as scavengers or
hunter-gatherers. Exploiting our generalist niche led to the elegant
evolutionary design of the human body and mind. In order to exploit a
patchy environment with plentiful low grade nutrients and scarce and
variable high value nutrients, the human mind had to become clever. We
became adaptive opportunists. The human body had to solve the energy
storage problem. Given a random food supply and variable energy
expenditure, our metabolism is evolved to solve a complex stochastic
energy management problem.
Many of the characteristics of our metabolism derive from the
evolved solutions to the energy flow problem. We clearly are designed to
live at an energy surplus, not at the balance preached by modern, steady
state models of fitness. I won't go into that here, but it is enough to
say that, given random energy intake and expenditure, a precise matching
of the two is impossible and matching on average would guarantee an early
death. One answer to achieving stochastic energy balance is male/female
pairing. Another is the ability to carry high density nutrients in our
hands so that nourishment can be taken to safer grounds and given to
mates. Yet another answer is our ability to store energy as fat, along
with the appetite to rapidly gorge fat-laden meat and bone marrow. These
adaptations to the ancestral environment can turn against us in a crowded
world where adaptive opportunism may have undesirable social
consequences. Our metabolism can turn against us when calorically rich,
but nutrionally depleted, food is all around us and available at little
expenditure of energy.
Life in a patchy resource environment requires the capability to
perform a wide variety of activities. Clearly, the body's design tells us
that extreme exertion of brief duration was an important human attribute,
essential for our survival and evolution. Our upright, bipedal posture
gives us the mobility to cover the range required of an omnivorous
generalist. A large brain is required for hominids to cover the widest
range known to any animal species. High value nutrients are essential to
the energy-demanding brain and small stomach required for high mobility
in a patchy savanna where high value nutrients are variable and fugitive.
Our muscle fiber composition reveals that we are adapted to extreme
intensity of effort. And the energy sources of these fibers shows that
the highly intense activities through which our ancestors "earned a
living" were of short duration (anaerobic metabolism came before aerobic
metabolism, which was grafted on later and the quickly exhausted fast
twitch fibers are likely to be the most primitive of our sources of
movement). Our ability to sweat, our relative hairlessness, our upright
and, hence, cool posture, our mobility, as well as our temperature
regulation and appetite mechanisms are designed to solve the problem of
keeping an energy-hungry, but delicate, brain alive in an energetic body
capable of high mobility and peak energy bursts.
Evolutionarily elegant design economizes on processes and energy. As
a consequence many structures and processes serve dual functions. Evolved
design resulted also in many compromises. These dual and compromised
designs, which are reliable at the high and variable energy flows of our
active ancestors go awry at the low energy flux typical of a modern,
sedentary individual. Many of the metabolic disorders--obesity,
carbohydrate intolerance, diabetes--that we see today are a result of
these design compromises. These "Western Diseases" are rare among
hunter-gatherers and were not part of the human ancestral experience.
They reflect an adaptation of the human body, which was designed for high
energy expenditure and variable diet and activity patterns, to modern
life. Because human metabolism is conditional on activity patterns, diet
alone is not sufficient to control body composition and obesity. The body
"reads" its food intake and hormone messengers in the context of its
activity patterns, so the message contained in a biochemical messenger is
decoded through the dynamic patterns of our actions. This is why
inactivity and food deprevation are so counterproductive in controlling
obesity. It is also why sedentism and its associated low energy flux
produce overeating.
The essence of human beings is that they are complex, adaptive and
self-organized systems. Adaptation is the essential human characteristic
and movement is the canonical form of its expression. Self-organization
is anchored by reference to a dynamic body image which lets there be a
self to serve as the fixed point from which the world is perceived.
Inactivity not only changes the human body, it alters the very structure
of our perception and understanding. Sedentism flattens the energy
landscape and weakens body image which is the reference of an organized
and autonomous self. The result of inactivity is a lack of purpose and
will. It takes good dynamics to produce a coherent, self-organized
individual and actions that are metabolically challenging produce a good
body image which anchors a strong and convergent dynamics. The brain is
adapted to action and its structure and health depend on movement. Long
ago, Darwin noted that the brains of wild animals were larger and heavier
than the brains of domesticated animals.
Metabolic Revolutions
Two metabolic revolutions shaped the evolution of homo sapiens. One
important revolution was when archaic homo sapiens adapted to the
glaciations and made the transition from hunter-gatherer to big game
hunter. This was some 40,000 to 60,000 years ago. This revolution
supplied the dense, high quality nutrients and lipids that let the brain
expand. Brain size expanded rapidly during the past 250,000 years, more
rapidly than in the preceding 2 million years. Brain expansion was
preceded by an expansion in body size, so much so that archaic humans
show bodies with fully modern features. They seem to have been at least
as large as the latest generation of well-fed Americans and far more
powerfully built. It is significant that the development of the
magnificent human body preceded the evolution of the human brain. Such a
brain could not live and would have no purpose but for the supremely
adaptive human body whose actions and perceptions it integrates.
The second metabolic revolution, and arguably the most important
revolution in the history of homo sapiens, was the agricultural
revolution beginning about 10,000 years ago in Asia and near the
Mediterranean. Agriculture came later to Europe, perhaps only 6,000 or
2,000 years ago. Great Britain was still making its transition to
agriculture at the time Caesar's army entered around 100 BC. The
paleoanthropological evidence shows that with the agricultural revolution
there was a decline in stature, cranial capacity, and muscularity, along
with a general decline in health and nutrition. (How do they know our
preagricultural ancestors were muscular? The bones are thick and dense
and the points where muscles were attached are robust.) This metabolic
revolution substituted routinized, repetitive work of grinding intensity
and a diet of low variety and protein content for the metabolically
varied physical activities of hunting and gathering and the enormous
variety of food and high protein content of hunter gatherer diets. Within
a few thousand years much of humanity had come to rely on a few starchy
crops for the overwhelming bulk of their calories. The repetitive work of
agriculture and grain processing left their mark in the high incidence of
arthritis that is found in the skeletons of our agriculturalist
ancestors.
Even today, most of the third world lives on a few starchy crops and
they exhibit the damage that a high carbohydrate diet with too little
fresh plant and animal foods can inflict. Those people who populate the
areas where agriculture began earliest show what is called a
Mediterranean physical type characterized, according to Webster, as
medium or short stature, slender build and small heads. Third world
children, living in rural, agricultural areas, live almost entirely on
grains. They rarely eat fresh fruit or vegetables and eat meat even less
often. They achieve less stature and test performance than urban children
and suffer skeletal and dental deficiencies. It is easy to tell from the
skeletons of our ancestors whether they were agriculturalists or hunter
gatherers. The agriculturalists have bad teeth, bone lesions, small and
underdeveloped skeletons and small craniums compared to hunter gatherers.
The important metabolic revolutions to follow agriculture were the
industrial and information revolutions. These energy conserving
revolutions lowered the level and variety of the metabolic challenges we
face still more.
Our ancestors are us. It was only 10,000 years ago that agriculture
changed the human lifeway from hunting and gathering to settled
agriculture. And the dramatic decline in human energy expenditure of the
industrial age occurred no more than 200 years ago. The information and
television age is no more than two decades old. In this brief time span
evolution has made few, if any, changes in what we inherited from the
prior 3 million years.
Fitness in a Modern World
The adaptive and variable energy demands of our ancestral existence
are gone. We live a low energy flux and metabolically unvaried existence
in bodies designed for another lifeway. We are hunter/gatherers in
pin-stripe suits, living a sedentary life and it is killing us in ways
our ancestors never experienced. Virtually all the degenerative
diseases--atherosclerosis, diabetes, high blood pressure, osteoporesis,
declining muscle mass--of modern civilization are unheard of among hunter
gatherers and were not part of our ancestral experience.
Most modern fitness prescriptions are static and agricultural. These
programs model the body as a machine, not as an adaptive organism.
Consequently, they prescribe a regime in which the body is underfed and
over-trained. They are not based on adaptation, but on steady state
analysis. These models assume the body is a linear process that maintains
a steady state. In fact, all bodily processes are highly non-linear and
these non-linearities must be exploited in any effective fitness program.
The key to exploiting the highly non-linear and dynamic adaptive
metabolic processes of the human body is to achieve the right mixture of
intensity and variety of activities.
Here is an example of the Zen-like twists that adaptive, non-linear
systems like human metabolism follow that confound mechanistic thinking.
The body uses fat in the aerobic (ST and lower IT) zone. So, linear
thinking suggests that to burn fat you should operate in that zone. It
would not surprise someone trained to understand the adaptive
capabilities of the human body that if you burn more fat the body will
find a way to produce more. And this is just what happens when you flow
energy through the aerobic pathway; your body releases hormone messengers
that signal higher fat production.
You do burn a higher proportion of calories as fat in the aerobic
zone, but that is no reason to stay there. You burn more calories and
more fat in total when you train at high intensity. And you do not open
the metabolic pathways that cause your body to make more fat. Energy that
flows over the anaerobic pathway signals your body to make more muscle
and to burn fat.
You incur an oxygen depth that raises metabolism for days after a
high intensity session. Above all, you bring adaptations that burn fat.
As the body remodels in response to the adaptive challenge presented by a
brief, high-intensity session, it preferentially burns fat. In addition,
you put on lean muscle mass that burns energy continuously. From 60 to 70
per cent of the energy you burn is at your basal metabolic rate. If you
gain lean muscle mass you raise your basal metabolic rate and, thus, burn
more energy 24 hours a day.
Too many people bring the wrong technology to their exercise. They
carry over the same technology they use in the office or factory, where
high volume and the ability to work long hours at routine tasks are often
the keys to success. Or they bring the technology of the research lab to
their exercise. Research on exercise physiology focuses almost
exclusively on aerobic exercise and creates a bias against anaerobic
exercise. High volume, repetitive exercise is the wrong technology for a
living organism and it is not the stuff the human body is adapted to do.
The right exercise technology is the one that shaped the human body; it
is the activity patterns characteristic of the hunting and gathering our
ancestors practiced 40,000 years ago, when the first fully modern homo
sapiens appeared on the scene. These same activity patterns are seen in
the movements of living hunter gatherers and wild animals.
If your personal trainer is working you out three days a week, doing
three sets of the same exercises, or, worse, 5 or even 6 days a week,
find another trainer. You are flooding your body with hormones that
consume lean body mass. These hormones also preferentially consume fast
twitch muscle, the very substance you are after for strength, lean mass,
and vitality. You are draining your adaptive capacity so that you cannot
build, or even keep up with the load. Worse still, you are compromising
your immune system.
Mechanistic prescriptions fail because they do not present the
metabolic challenges and variety of the ancestral environment for which
our bodies are designed. Working out 5 or 6 days a week doing many sets
of exercises per body part and spending over an hour per workout imposes
a chronic load on the body for which it is poorly designed to adapt.
Virtually all the body's adaptive mechanisms are designed to deal with
acute, not chronic, stresses. Exercise should mimic the activities of our
ancestral existence; we are adaptive organisms that thrive on variety,
not machines designed for high volume routine.
The importance of play to the human species is evident in the degree
to which adults retain juvenile characteristics. This form of
developmental delay (neoteny) let the brain grow relative to body size.
Neoteny allows us to retain the capability to adapt and invent and remain
playful well past the age typical of other species. The typical gym head
or jogger logging hours of weight or miles at moderate intensity is
working, not playing. He or she is engaged in a chronically stressful
activity, not healthy play. Neither of these methods for achieving
fitness is a model of activity that conceivably could been typical of our
evolutionary past. An adaptive hunter-gatherer designed for mobility,
variety and play cannot thrive on an industrial or agricultural program
for fitness. The human body is an organism, not a machine.
The Evolutionary Model
The evolutionary model combines activities of varying intensity to
mimic our ancestral hunter-gatherer existence. The key is to hit the
right balance of intensity and variety. You have to live in the fast
twitch (FT) muscle fiber zone where your metabolic rate is many times
your basal metabolism for intermittent, brief intervals. Most sedentary
individuals live entirely in the ST region and never achieve the
metabolic peaks that are essential to adaptation. Grim aerobicizers and
high volume weight trainers live in the slow twitch (ST) and intermediate
twitch (IT) muscle fiber zone and do way too much work.
The evolutionary model of a healthy lifestyle is to combine brief,
but intense, work outs in a gym (the FT zone) with a wide variety of
activities that mix intensity and duration randomly (mixing the IT and ST
zones with brief spurts into the FT zone). Roller blading, bicycling,
walking, sprinting, tennis, basketball, power walking, hitting softballs
and so on are the sorts of activities that mix IT and ST fibers with
intermittent FT action.
Activities are spaced randomly according to a power law distribution
which not only fits the hunter-gather activity rhythms but also virtually
every process in a healthy human being---healthy heart beats, brain
waves, cellular ion channel pulses, and the coordination dynamics of
movement all have the distinctive signature of self-similarity and power
law variation. It is when these patterns show too much regularity that
organization and coordination break down; for example, epileptics show
too much, not too little, regularity in their brain waves. Heart attacks
are the result of too much regularity in contractions that leads to a
loss of coordination and seizure.
A power law looks like this: Most of its mass is located at the low
intensity activities and there is little mass at the highest intensities.
The evidence strongly indicates this kind of intensity-frequency mix was
typical of our ancestors. The far left zone, at the peaks and with brief
duration, is the FT zone. The middle zone is the IT and ST zone and the
long tail at the right is the ST zone. Most people live in the right hand
zone. Even when they exercise they only make it into the IT zone and do
not trigger the adaptive metabolic pathways that open only when you enter
the FT zone.
You need to live intermittently and briefly in the FT zone to live
according to our ancestral lifeway. You also need to enjoy the variation
at the far right tail and get plentiful rest. One of the worst features
of modern life is its compression in the variability of our
activities---both the right hand and left hand tails are compressed
relative to the variation in a power law. When the ends of the activity
distribution are compressed to the middle, our activities fall within a
narrow frequency band. A compressed distribution is a chronic stressor,
we get neither enough playful, intense activity nor enough rest. Animals
in the wild move according to power laws. Think of a lion or jaguar. They
are muscular and lean and spend long periods in languid rest and brief,
highly intense periods in the hunt.
Power Law Training
Why is a power law a good model of adaptive training? A power law
describes a statistical distribution of intensity and frequency of action
that is characteristic of a complex adaptive system functioning at
maximum efficiency. Power law variation represents a balance of order and
variability that is representative of self-organized, adaptive systems.
All humans are self-organized dynamic systems. Systems that live in the
critical region between order and chaos display power law behavior.
How do you train according to a power law? A power law of the form
Intensity = Frequency- beta, gives the right balance of structure and
novelty. The music of Bach and Mozart contains the mixture of structure
and novelty characteristic of power laws. The power law is a statistical
distribution, meaning it describes probabilities, not certainties. Hence,
randomization is an essential element of power law training. But, so is
pattern. Your activities cannot become too random, or they lose pattern
and drift without memory. There will be some drift in frequency so that
there will be time periods when you will not do high intensity workouts
for two or more weeks (periodization falls out of the power law
naturally). At other times, you may have 2 or 3 high intensity sessions
in a row.
The real point is to embrace randomness and variety within the
context of structured repetitiveness. Good intuitive models of power law
variation are the movements of the wild lion or the music of Bach or
Mozart.
NBA basketball is an example of power law variation. Pro basketball
is not an aerobic sport, it actually is an anaerobic sport full of power
moves, quick bursts, sprints, and leaps mixed in with half time rest,
quarter breaks, pauses, free throws, time outs, and bench time. What NBA
players have is the ability to use these brief intervals to quickly
recover their phosphate energy stores (they use the alactic pathway
discussed below).
NBA athletes and NFL defensive backs provide evidence that power law
training makes you powerful and lean. NBA players are the leanest and
most powerful in any professional sport (their body fat is around 5 to 7
percent). NFL defensive backs and running backs come close (around 8
percent body fat). Like NBA players, NFL defensive and running backs do
burst/rest moves through out the game, randomly timed, with a duration
and intensity pattern that looks like a power law (patterns are not
bunched up around a mean, they are spread over all scales and with the
characteristic power law shape shown in the graph above).
Low intensity, ST activities are the high frequency activities in
the long right hand tail of the power law distribution. These ST
activities include maintaining posture, walking, and slow running.
Intermediate intensity activities, such as moderately paced jogging,
tennis, and aerobics, mix IT and ST fibers and their frequencies are
distributed over the middle range of the power curve. Less frequent, high
intensity activities like jumping, sprinting and high intensity training,
hit the FT fiber. These high intensity activities must be infrequent and
brief in duration as shown by the left hand tail of the power
distribution.
A power law distribution of activities means the intensity, spacing,
duration and volume of training are variable in order to present a
constant novelty in metabolic challenges while retaining enough structure
and repetitiveness to maximize adaptive capability.
When you train like a hunter, you follow a power law distribution of
intensity and frequency. You distribute activities so that you hit highly
intense metabolic peaks briefly and intermittently. This is the FT fiber
region. You also scale intensity within a set.
ASCENDING THRESHOLD SETS
In order to hit all the fibers and scale intensity according to a
power law, I do supersets of ascending weight and descending repetitions.
The sequence is intended to move up the energy and muscle fiber
hierarchy, recruiting successively more muscle fibers and different fiber
types until all but the FT fibers drop out. This exploits the "size
principle" which says that the threshold of intensity needed to stimulate
the motorneurons that fire the muscles increases with the size of the
motorneuron. The FT fibers have the largest motorneurons and, therefore,
require the highest intensity to fire. Power law training exploits this
feature.
You apply the technology by doing one long superset of ascending
intensity to force the ST and then the IT fibers to drop out until only
the FT fibers are left. I begin a set with a fairly light weight, lifting
and lowering the weight slowly to prefatigue the ST fibers. Do this for
15 repetitions. Then, taking only enough time to increase the weight do 8
to 10 more repetitions at a faster speed. Increase the weight one more
time and do 4 to 6 repetitions at high, but controlled speed. I also
slightly increase the speed within each set of repetitions, aiming at the
FT fibers near the end of each stage.
I pause between stages of the superset just long enough to change
the weights and this 10 to 20 seconds is enough to regenerate the ATP and
PCr to do the next set. By the third phase, the lactic acid is burning,
but it will quickly be taken up because I don't do any more of that
exercise and move on to something completely different. (This is an
advanced technique. It takes conditioning and a tolerance for lactic acid
to get to this stage. To begin, do only two stages of the superset,
aiming for 12 and 7 reps. Then move on.) I may aim at 15 reps, 8 reps, 4
reps in each phase of the superset, but no one is counting; it is always
the acid burn that tells me when to stop, not some preset target of reps.
I do not go to complete failure, ever. Failure at the last rep is
over rated because by then the high energy muscle phosphates are gone and
the lactic acid is limiting your power. You lose form and get hurt when
you push too hard on the last rep. You don't develop strength using the
muscle when its power is depleted and restricted by lactate, it is better
to use alactic training (see below) for power.
Each exercise is one brief superset with only 10 seconds rest
between. Then it is over and that is all I do for that muscle group and I
move quickly to the next group.
ALACTIC TRAINING
Another variation in the power law technology I use in my training
is designed to work what is called the alactic energy pathway. This
training exploits power law variation as well; it just works farther to
the left on the power curve, well up the intensity scale into the FT
fiber region. In this region, the duration of effort must be extremely
short, on the order of a few seconds and milliseconds. Here, you imagine
an ancestor like homo erectus sprinting on the grassy savanna to a patch
of trees to escape one of the formidable predators that roamed over
Africa 2 million years ago. The alactic pathway is what supplies this
energy in the first few seconds; it is the engine for the "fight or
flight" response that permits us to make our quickest and most powerful
moves.
The alactic pathway is called that because it relies on the high
energy phosphates stored in our muscles whose metabolism is rapid and
does not produce lactic acid. Hence, it is a-lactic. The muscles contain
enough phosphates (PCr and ATP) to generate extremely high force for up
to 3 seconds. During that time the movement is powered primarily by FT
fiber. Beyond that time you begin to use muscle glycogen and produce
lactic acid. Those extreme physical feats you hear about---mothers
lifting cars off their children and so on---draw on this high energy
pathway. At peak intensity, some athletes may generate up to 7,000 or
8,000 watts. This power is generated in very brief episodes, for example,
in a high jump a power of 4,000 watts is produced in 0.02 seconds. For
durations exceeding a minute, a rate of 350 watts can be produced only by
elite, highly trained athletes for no more than 4 or 5 minutes. Beyond a
second or two at high power levels, lactate begins to accumulate and
limit performance. These data fit a power law perfectly in the way power
declines with duration (see the power curve above). They are further
support for the power law training techniques developed in my book.
In working for power one wants to hit the alactic pathway. The ATP
and PCr energy sources for alactic power are quickly regenerated within 5
to 10 seconds for trained individuals. Those who are new to power law
technology may take longer to recover until they have worked at it
awhile. One can hit the alactic pathway to gain power and not build
lactic acid by doing what I call alactic training. It is very easy to do,
not tiring, and a real source of power. It hits the FT fibers more
completely than just about anything else.
I do sets that I call 1/5s or "one, fives" because that describes
how I do them. I do one repetition, then put the weight down for 5
seconds. Then I do another rep and put the weight down another 5 seconds.
Then another, and so on for a sequence of about 4 to 8 repetitions.
That's it, then move on to the next exercise. What you have done is to
achieve between 4 and 8 high quality repetitions without building
lactate. The 5 second pause between reps is enough to regenerate the
muscle phosphates if you are in reasonable shape. Up to 10 seconds pause
is appropriate until you have acquired the ability to recover quickly.
You can use reasonably heavy weight without the risk that goes with doing
multiple repetitions with heavy weights.
Alactic training is much safer and more productive of strength than
training to full failure. The reason is simple, doing multiple
repetitions builds lactic acid which limits your power and ability to
handle heavy weight. By doing just 1 rep and resting 5 seconds you retain
nearly all of your muscle power. This lets you handle heavier weight and
do quality movements. You never force yourself to work to failure, as
many muscle magazines and training authorities seem to recommend. There
is no danger because you use a weight that is below your maximum and do
not try to force a depleted muscle through another repetition. There is
no straining to try to do that "last rep".
The theory that the "last rep" is the best one is wrong in my
opinion. You have little strength left by then because the high energy
phosphates are gone and the lactic acid limits your strength. This means
that the reps leading up to that last rep must use a weight well below
what will tax your muscle when it is at full strength. Multiple reps
build endurance, not power. Your endurance is developed by the ascending
sets discussed above. Also, much of what passes for endurance is actually
the ability to recover quickly from peak effort (this is the kind of
endurance NBA players have). By doing a sequence of 4 to 8 or more 1 reps
with 5 seconds in between, you train your recovery ability so that you
restore power quickly. Because phosphate replenishment uses the aerobic
pathway, and uses fat preferentially over carbohydrate, you indirectly
develop your aerobic capacity and burn fat as well when you do alactic
training.
Even though you are doing only 1 rep, you don't try to do maximum
weight. Just use a challenging weight as low as 25 and as high as 10 per
cent below your maximum. You can even progress to a higher percentage of
your maximum as you to these 1 reps. With 1/5s you get up to 8 quality
reps at high weight.
An alactic program that works well for me.
Plyometrics are another form of alactic exercise. Plyometrics really
get the FT fiber. I find them to be quite safe (given my condition and
experience, that is) if you do not do drop jumps; that is, you jump up
rather than down from height. I leap to catch a high bar, trying to hit
my chin on the bar and starting a few feet away from the bar to extend
the distance. With a jump and walking back to the starting position this
is an alactic exercise (the return gives time to regenerate the
phosphates). If there is no high bar, jumping to touch a high point on a
wall will do.
Bench push offs are another safe use of plyometric technology. When
I do them I stand away from a low bench. Feet together. Fall to the bench
to catch it by your hands at chest height (you should be in a push up
position at this time). Then I explode with my arms to return to the
standing position, keeping my legs as straight as I am able and still
attain the starting position.
POWER WALKING
Our ancestors walked a lot carrying heavy weight in order to move
camp and bring back as much of the kill as they could. Power walking,
laden with real weight on the order of 35 to 100 pounds, is an effective
modern version of what our ancestors did. Power walking with a back pack
or scuba diving weights around the waist dramatically increases the
intensity and effectiveness of walking. And it is about as effective as
jogging for aerobic capacity, without the pounding and damage. It is what
women among hunter gatherers do when they gather. For example, Kung San
women typically carry an infant on a seven mile trip foraging for plant
foods and return with a 35 pound load. They only do this 2 or 3 times a
week for they live in a kind of natural affluence where food is readily
available.
Males among hunter gatherers do not carry the large game our
ancestors did, so they are not a good model of power walking for males.
Consider this instead as a model. A historical source reports that 5
Indian braves drove 5 bison into a pit. After they killed these 2000
pound bison, they pulled them out of a pit more than 10 feet deep, lined
them up and skinned and butchered them. Then, they carried as much as
they could back to camp to get others to return for the rest. What a
wonderful model of fitness, combining speed, power, strength, and
stamina. You can be sure this successful hunt was followed by plenty of
rest and play and feasting. This model is always on my mind when I think
of what fitness means.
YOUR PERSONAL TRAINING
Everyone has to adapt their own workouts and activity patterns to
their own capacities and intentions. If evolution teaches us anything it
is that we are all different even though we share a large set of common
attributes and metabolic processes. For most people, a move from
mechanistic training to adaptive training would consist primarily of
cutting back on the number of sets and how often they work out. This is
combined with a little pushing up of the pace and intensity of the
workouts and cutting way back on how long they are and on the rest
between sets.
The sophisticated variations on the power law that I use are not required
and are there when you gain condition and strength. A brisk
and intense workout that leaves you feeling challenged in each
exercise, whatever your personal level of fitness, is what we are after.
One upper and one lower body workout per week, of no more than 40 minutes
duration, and one all around workout per week of completely different
exercises is a good model to begin with. The all around work out should
be focused on symmetry and grace and the more intense workouts on the
large muscles.
SYMMETRY
Symmetry is crucial for it is a reliable evolutionary clue to health
and, hence, it is something we find attractive. Tumors and pathologies
produce gross asymmetries and our love of symmetry reflects the
reproductive success of our ancestors who were sensitive to these clues.
Stay away from biceps and triceps stuff, they make you lose symmetry.
Work on calves, traps, neck and back. You look taller, another reliable
evolutionary clue that women use to find good genes, if you move more
mass to the neck and shoulder girdle and to the calves. And you will be
more balanced and powerful. A thick trunk is another evolutionary clue.
It is a signal that suggests pregnancy in the female and pathology in the
male. I strive for the X-look---mass in the shoulder girdle, upper (not
lower) chest and back, the calves and lower quads. This requires strict
form so that you do not use your trunk to heave weights. If you work out
like a grunt, heaving and cheating on reps, you will look like a grunt.
INTENSITY AND BREVITY
Power law training requires intense but brief work outs and long
intervals between sessions. Intensity and brevity are the keys to
promoting the hormone drives that are essential to adaptation. So
important are these drives that one could say they are the real objective
of the workout. A workout that is over long depletes the adaptive
hormones and causes a surge in destructive hormones.
The open intervals between high intensity sessions are filled with
activity of intermediate and low intensity, with a spurt into the FT
zone. These activities include roller blading, hiking with one of my
grandchildren in a back carrier, or walking and sprinting in deep sand at
the beach, riding my motorcycle on back canyon roads and high mountain
dirt trails (wind chill is a very effective device for shedding fat),
shooting baskets, and so on. This is not a frenetic schedule, filled with
mandatory exercise. It is playful and fun, not work.
Variation in weight, repetitions, and speed is consistent with power
law training because there is no characteristic scale in a power law.
Power law activities exhibit self-similarity at all scales. This means
for speed, weight, and duration. My work outs are randomly timed; they
may fall on two consecutive days, though this would be rare. At the other
extreme, they may be a week apart. I aim for one upper and one lower body
high intensity work out per week along with one easier, all round work
out. Sometimes, I feel like more and may do up to 4 workouts of varying
intensity during a week. Often only one or two workouts fill out the
week. An average workout is 25 minutes. No workout is more than 40
minutes, most are less. I often finish my whole workout while other
people are still doing sets on a machine or a body part. I never leave
the gym tired, just relaxed and feeling good.
Motivation
If you think about the challenges our ancestors faced it will help
you realize that what some fitness and motivational experts see as
motivational problems are actually evolved adaptations. Recognition and
acceptance go a long way toward helping you make healthy changes.
1. The fact that you are alive is a remarkable thing. The odds against it
are great. The genes you carry contain information from a continuous
strand of surviving organisms that extends 2 billion years back in time.
You are an improbable event and your existence is testimony to the
toughness and adaptiveness of the ancestral line from which you come. You
are a survivor, well equiped to live and be successful in the world for
which your body and mind are adapted. Recognize, however, that the world
for which your genes encode a successful design is not today's world; it
is the world of some 10,000 to 40,000 years ago.
2. Your brain and body "expect" you to live as a hunter gatherer. They
are highly adaptive by design, for that is the key requirement of our
ancestral lifeway. But, a natural life is one of movement and action, of
challenge and response, of variety and adaptation. Your brain still
"sees" sensory inputs as though you are a hunter gatherer and, at the
instinctual level, directs your actions according to what spells adaptive
success in the environment of your ancestors. (Example: you freeze before
a large audience because your ancestors increased their odds of surviving
when exposed on open ground by freezing to escape detection.) If you
accept that some parts of this metaphor are true of you, you will be more
relaxed and less apt to punish yourself for things you do, or don't do
(like get out and move around).
3. Laziness and over-eating are adaptations that let your ancestors pass
their genes down to you. These labels place over-critical value
judgements on what are evolved adaptations. Energy was a precious
resource in the ancestral environment, and it still is in the third world
where people barely get enough to eat. What we call laziness is an
adaptive, instinctual behavior that kept our ancestors from wasting
precious energy in a world where high energy expenditure was required for
food. Because the agricultural revolution dramatically lowered the price
of carbohydrate, we have abundant and cheap food energy available at
nearly zero energy expenditure. Because cheap carbohydrate is all around
us, the caloric return to our foodseeking energy expenditures is so high
now that we have to find ways to expend energy in healthful ways.
Evolutionary training "tricks" the brain into thinking it is still 40,000
BC and resets your metabolism as well.
4. Variety and play are the essential human attributes. By keeping your
work outs brief and exhilarating you won't get bored. By adding lots of
outdoor activity and play, you will enjoy the power and fitness you gain.
If you start a new sport, or pick up one long neglected as you begin
evolutionary training, you will see how the power you gain improves your
play. The feedback between the training and your new power in the sport
will be habit forming. (The evolutionary basis of sport seems clear. For
example, the number of players in most popular team sports today is about
equal to the number of prime age males that would be alive in a typical
paleolithic band of hunter gatherers.)
I fail to see how anyone can train 5 or 6 days a week in the gym and
for hours at a time. That is factory or agricultural work, not anything
human beings were evolved to do. And the paradox is that you will gain
less strength and fitness if you overtrain. And you will join the
thousands who quit out of sheer boredom.
I keep no records for this encourages the accounting mentality which
is the bane of adaptive training. It is the burn and heart rate that tell
you when you are in the FT zone. Record keeping focuses you on the wrong
goals. You begin to think it is important how much you can bench press or
how big your arms are. It is what you can do outside the gym that
matters, not what you can do in it. Big arms ruin speed and coordination
for they locate too much mass far from the central axis of the body,
creating a high polar moment of inertia.
Lean Body Mass and Health
Intermittent, intense and brief work outs build muscle mass that
burns energy continuously. They promote hormone drives that keep you
young. They switch the body's metabolic pathways so that food goes to
muscle and organ mass and not to fat. The intensity is the key to
reaching the fast twitch fibers of the muscles, which are the key fibers
to staying young. A primary indicator of aging is loss of fast twitch
muscle fiber. Retaining your metabolic headroom through intense, brief
and variable training promotes retention of lean body mass, organ and
brain mass---you stay younger and smarter than joggers and dieters who
lose muscle, organ and brain mass. Aerobic exercise of long duration and
moderate intensity isn't the answer. It promotes free radical damage
through the oxidation of fat and when it is done often enough and at low
intensity, it catabolizes muscle mass. There is a suspiciously high rate
of cancer among marathoners.
Lean body mass is the primary indicator of health status. Death is
universal among persons who lose 40 per cent of their lean body mass.
Lean body mass is the most accurate predictor of survival time for
victims of starvation, trauma, infection, AIDS and other acute diseases,
regardless of the nature of the disease. So powerful a predictor of
health status is the rate of loss of lean body mass that it seems to be
part of the process of dying. Rapid protein wastage is a mediator, not
just an indicator of death.
Dieters beware. Rapid weight loss wastes lean body mass. Starvation
studies show that brain mass may decline as much as 3 to 5 per cent with
food deprivation. Other organs lose far more mass. A pigeon lost 93 per
cent of its fat tissue, but 45 per cent of its heart, 42 per cent of its
skeletal muscle and 71 per cent of its spleen on a starvation diet. These
experiments are hard to do on humans, but the Nazis did do such human
experiments and found similar rates of loss of lean body and organ
tissue. Brain scans on anorexics reveal that they have shriveled brains.
People who eat only once a day waste lean body mass all day. They
are awash in catabolic hormones that use lean body mass to try to keep
their brain alive on the glucose it requires. When they finally eat, they
eat so much they get a surge of insulin that packs the energy in the food
away in fat. Over time, their body composition changes---they come to
have this small body inside a relatively inert shell of fat. They look
large, but the active part of them is small.
Don't keep track of your total weight, keep track of your lean body
mass. Your lean body mass is the real, metabolically active, you. It is
the tissue that allows you to function and think and live. If you gain
lean body mass, you lose fat and you keep it off because your metabolic
rate rises. Everyone should keep track of their lean body mass to monitor
their health status.
Aging is a slow form of lean body mass loss. Adults lose about 5 per
cent of their lean body mass per decade after they enter their thirties.
Most of the muscle they lose is FT fiber, for they cease by some age to
live in the FT region. They settle into the ST region and, consequently,
as they age their muscle fibers atrophy. The 40 per cent rule may hold
here too. Progressive aging and deterioration resulting in a 40 per cent
loss of lean body mass may be a precursor or mediator of the dying
process. The aging just die over a longer time scale than do acutely ill
individuals. The aged lose lean mass and most of it is FT fiber. Because
they do not and cannot stress their skeletons, they lose bone density.
Their skeletons are vulnerable to falls and their muscles are not strong
or quick enough to keep them from falling because their FT fibers
atrophy. Keeping your FT fibers is the best way to stay young.
Feeding
Eating is dead simple.
1. Homo sapiens is an omnivore; it is not all that important what you eat
as long as it contains ample variety and lots of amino acids and
essential lipids. Hunter gatherer diets contain an enormous variety of
plant foods and are high in protein (the median is about 35 per cent of
calories from protein). The only universal characteristic of ancestral
and living hunter gatherer diets is the almost complete absence of simple
carbohydrates. There were no simple carbohydrates like sugar and pasta.
Fruits were tough and fibrous, not the refined, sweet stuff we have
today. The closest thing to a simple carb was honey, rare and guarded by
wild bees. There were no grain or cereal sources of carbs in the
ancestral diet.
2. Live at high energy flux and eat randomly, varying food intake to the
scale of activities. This includes the odd brief fast, as though hunting
is lean. The body regulates food intake naturally when you live at the
high energy flux of an evolutionary trainer. It is when we are sedentary
and live at low energy flux that our appetite mechanisms fail to match
energy intake to expenditure (the evidence shows that infants regulate
energy intake precisely and children only lose this ability when they
become sedentary). Animals confined to feeding pens or cages eat more
than they expend in energy. That is how cattle are fattened for
slaughter. Humans who live at low energy flux because they are sedentary
and inactive will over eat, just like cattle in a feeding pen. Even
though they are free to move about and are not caged, their metabolism is
trapped in a feeding pen mode.
Its another one of those wonderful evolutionary paradoxes. When we
are inactive, we trigger an eating response and eat more than we expend
in energy. The basis of this may lie in an adaptation that would let our
ancestors recover from the intense activities of the hunt by eating
beyond their energy requirements when they rest in order to rebuild
tissue and energy stores. The ability to eat beyond energy needs would be
essential to the survival of any organism that lived in the world of our
ancestors with its variable energy expenditure and intake.
The answer is clear: live as though you are a free-ranging, adaptive
human being, not like some animal being fattened in a pen for the kill.
It is hopeless to try to attain the precisely balanced intake and
expenditure of calories preached by diet promoters. And it is impossible
to do if you are sedentary for you trigger this evolved over eating
adaptation.
Our ancestors were better nourished than all but a few of us because
they ate low calorie, nutritionally dense foods, all fresh and
uncontaminated, and they ate in large quantities to fulfill their high
energy needs. Dieters who face calorically rich, low nutrient foods and
eat in small quantities face a real risk of malnutrition. If they are
sedentary the risk is even higher because they must restrict food intake
so severely.
I am more concerned with energy expenditure than intake, for it is
energy expenditure that determines energy flux and appetite. High energy
flux brings our appetite control mechanisms into the ancestral range
where they were evolved to operate.
3. Live as though you are in the world that existed before the invention
of agriculture. There was no grain or cereal or manufactured food in the
ancestral environment. Our ancestors ate fresh fruits and vegetables and
meat. They got no milk beyond the age of 4. They ate no cereals and
consumed no vegetable oils. Their diets were not particularly low on
fats; indeed, for a few million years prehuman hominids may have lived on
the fatty bone marrow and brains of scavenged kills more than on fresh
meat. Even when they became premier big game hunters, humans preferred
the fatty cuts of meat. Our brains use glucose for energy (and hence our
preference for sweets) but are made of lipids. Some of these essential
brain lipids can be gotten only from animal fat. At least, that is where
our ancestors got them.
Seeds did not enter the diet until about 14,000 years ago. Vegetable
oils are a completely novel substance in the evolution of human eating.
The processed oils now recommended so heavily by nutritionists are no
more than a few decades old. There is zero evidence to indicate that
eating this stuff is a good thing to do. And, it is well known that
processing alters the shape of the fatty chains making them nearly
impossible to metabolize and that they are readily oxidized to form free
radical chain reactions that damage body tissue.
The intolerance that many people show to grains, milk and seafoods
can, in part, be explained by how recently they entered the human diet.
Many of us are poorly adapted to these foods, particularly if we are from
a culture that began to rely on agriculture or dairying recently. We are
not adapted because gene frequencies have not settled to the range where
such individuals become rare in the population. That will happen only
after enough time has passed for the lactose-and grain-intolerant among
us to leave fewer children to carry our genes into the future than those
who can eat the stuff.
Epidemic carbohydrate intolerance is another clue that we are not
yet adapted to a post-agricultural, post-industrial, information age
diet. To emphasize once more, the only universal in the omnivorous human
eating record as reflected in hunter gatherer diets and in the ancestral
diet is the absence of simple- and grain- or cereal-based carbohydrate.
The conventional wisdom and diet advice of the experts that you should
eat grain- or cereal-based carbohydrate flies in the face of the
evolutionary record.
4. Eat when hungry. For me, that is at least 4 times a day, often more,
but sometimes less. Eating once a day degrades lean body mass and reduces
your metabolism. Your lean body disintegrates and your fat mass
increases. Nobody who wants to be lean and healthy should eat only once a
day.
5. I take antioxidants. Our food sources of minerals and antioxidants are
not as rich as those of the ancient past. Free radical oxidation of body
tissues is one of the primary aging mechanisms. Scavenge these free
radicals with antioxidants.
The beauty of the 40,000 BC eating model is that you eat no canned,
frozen, packaged, or manufactured food; all fresh foods, never fried,
always roasted, broiled, boiled, or whatever. You don't have to read
labels because nothing you buy to eat comes with a label (nature doesn't
do this). Some latitude is necessary (I do not believe in rigid rules for
anything anyway), but the 40,000 BC model is always guiding your choices.
In short, live, eat, work and play like it is 40,000 BC while you
enjoy what the modern world has to offer. Live on the power curve where
life and intelligence are maximized.
Does evolutionary training work? It does for me. At 59 years of age,
I look like an NFL running back: 6' 1", 205 pounds with a dense and
athletic musculature and less than 8% body fat. Based on body
composition, strength, flexibility, reaction time, and blood profile, a
research institute rates my biological age at 32. Evolutionary training
is so productive I spend very little time in the gym, usually from 1 to 2
hours a week. The intensity of training like an adaptive hunter is
exhilarating and the brevity leaves you feeling fresh. You gain time for
work and play. You also gain a toughness and energetic plasticity that
leaves you poised for the many adaptive challenges that life brings.
-
TJ, what do you think of green tea?
Yes? No?
I drink 16 ounces of it atleast every other day..
It's LOADED with antioxidants.
Good before a workout or after?Much better before, the caffeine will amp you up too
much if you drink it afterwards.
In fact, I'll have a cup of Panax Ginseng before I
hit the gym as well -- excellent at preparing the adrenals
for a hard lift.
I don't drink coffee at all, and during the winter,with the try air, I like to sip something hot...Just curious
what you think of green tea...
Mixed with some stevia, it's excellent on a cold day..
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
CATEGORY: training/anaerobic
TECHNICAL: *
SUMMARY:
This short note summarizes a thing known as "evolutionary
fitness" which is a strategy designed by Arthur De Vany to promote
health and longevity via diet and exercise. The main crux of
his work was to define a training program to take advantage of
the way we evloved. To a degree, I believe he's done that.
In fact, I agree mostly with his suggestions. I have another
article that goes into greater detail about his plan. For now,
I just send this note. In a short while I will post my complete
training program to the list and show you how it is very similar
to his. He focuses on intensity and variety, and that is a key
to any successfull program.
The program I have to offer uses something similar but
defines itself in more specific terms. You will hear things like
"progressive overload", "holistic training", and "periodization".
Those 3 things have combined to help me surpass my wildest
expectations in the gym, and they will help you too.
Suffice it to say that, if you train scientifically,
strength plateaus will be a thing of the past..
-------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur De Vany's EVOLUTIONARY FITNESS
Copyright © 1995 by Arthur De Vany.
This is a brief description of my in-progress book on the
evolutionary diet and physical fitness program. You may download this for
personal reading but may not redistribute or archive without permission.
The book should be published in 1998.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction
Evolutionary Fitness is a result of my personal and scientific quest
to stay fit and young. It combines my experience as a professional and
amateur athlete, and as someone who has spent more than 40 years
exercising, with my scientific interests in evolution and complex adaptive
systems. It begins with the premise that our bodies and minds are adapted
to an ancient environment that passed more than 10,000 years ago. We
evolved as hunter-gatherers over at least three million years and that
lifeway shapes our attributes, behaviors, and capabilities as human
beings. It is by understanding the hunter-gatherer adaptation and
incorporating the activity and eating patterns of our ancestral lifeway
that we can live a natural and healthy life in a modern world that is very
different from the one in which human beings evolved.
Darwin and Fitness
In developing this idea, I take the Darwinian approach that has been
so successful in the new fields of evolutionary psychology and medicine
and apply it to physical fitness. But, I integrate a Darwinian perspective
with the theory of chaos and complex systems. A deeper look at the
evolutionary record, the new revelations in the biological sciences, my
scientific work in complex systems, and my own personal experience as a
life-long student of fitness tell me that the right model for
understanding health and fitness must combine insights from evolution and
chaos.
Non Linear Systems
When the body is viewed as a complex adaptive system exploiting
evolved mechanisms, it becomes clear that conventional thinking about
diets and obesity is wrong. The human organism is an open energy system,
operating far from equilibrium. Diet and exercise programs that are mired
in linear thinking are completely inappropriate for understanding human
energy metabolism.
The primary objectives for any exercise and diet program must be to
counter hyperinsulemia (chronically elevated insulin) and hypoexertion
(wasting the body's lean mass through inactivity)---these are the number
one health risks according to the National Institutes of Health. A natural
diet, based on the evolutionary record effectively counters
hyperinsulemia. Intermittent, intense exercise in brief spurts promotes
hormone drives that quench hyperinsulemia and build muscle and bone
density that keep you young and lean.
Ancestral Dynamic Patterns
Intermittent, intense, and playful exercise mimics the activity
patterns that were essential to the emergence and evolution of the human
species. High intensity, intermittent and brief training mixed with power
walking and play is closer than aerobic exercise, high volume weight
training, or sedentism to how our ancestors lived. We are hunter-gatherers
and have been for all of human and pre-human history. Only 15,000 years
have passed since the last Ice Age, not long enough for bodies suited for
the sedentary modern age to have evolved. If such bodies ever do evolve
they cannot have our minds, for the human mind evolved to live in a brain
adapted to an energetic, versatile and dynamic body.
Fitness from Chaos
In the book, I present new technology for exercise --- power law
training --- that is, in reality, as ancient as life itself. Power law
training is the technology consistent with the chaotic natural dynamics
that science finds in all living things; it matches the rhythm of life
itself and is found in the movements of wild animals, healthy heart beats,
neuronal dynamics in the brain, and the music of Bach.
Mind-Body Integration
Our brains and bodies are dynamic objects that thrive on challenge
and movement; intermittent intensity brings key adaptations in hormone
drives, neurological function, and body composition. The mixture of
variety, intermittent intensity, and play bind perception and kinesthetics
to create a dynamic and positive self image which is the reference point
on which our knowledge and living are organized. Movement and play build
muscle and cognitive maps in the brain and repair the mind/body continuum.
The Big Idea
Your brain and body are evolved for life in 40,000 BC; take care of
the hunter gatherer body and mind that you carry in that pin-striped suit.
Outline of the Book
Figuring out how our ancestors lived occupies the first part of the
book. Understanding what these ancestral living patterns mean in terms of
body/mind processes is the challenge I tackle in the second part of the
book. The disease that results from adaptations to modern living patterns
is the puzzle I investigate in the third part of the book. Learning to
live and eat like it is 40,000 BC while living in this modern world and
enjoying what it has to offer is the challenge I take up in the last part
of the book.
The Author
I am not a "trainer to the stars" or a reformed overeater (the most
common types of authors in this genre), but I am a scientist and athlete
and a successful example of what I preach. At 60 years of age, I look
like a Cro-Magnon ancestor from the Paleolithic: 6' 1", 205 pounds with a
dense and athletic musculature and less than 8% body fat.
Based on body composition, strength, flexibility, reaction time, and
blood profile, a research institute rates my biological age at 32. Not so
remarkable when you understand that what we call aging in this modern
world really is the accumulated damage of inactivity and dietary abuse.
Hunter gatherers don't age like Westerners do.
Art De Vany, age 60, September 1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Which brings up an interesting question.. I'm running platinum
plugs in my '97 (recommended), but I see that newer models
run iridium eh?
Seems to me the hotter plug might give me better performance,
(better detonation), so am I crazy or what?
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
This is great if ya got an ice cream maker and 30 mins handy..
1) Pour 2 cups heavy whipping cream into a pot and heat it
to body temp - beat/whip it the whole time..
2) Dump in 4 egg yolks, one at a time, and continue blending, the
mixture should start thickening by now.
3) Pop in 2 tbs. of sugar free Jello Pudding Powder (banana and
choco work the best..) and continue beating/mixing until it's rich
and creamy with no clumps.
4) remove from heat and let cool to room temperature. After cooled,
pop in 8-10 packets of Aspartame (Equal) (or your fave sweetener)
and blend in 1 tbsp. of vanilla extract.
5) pour into ice cream maker and spin up until done..
6) ENJOY!!
Makes soft-server "Dairy Queen" like very low-carb ice cream..
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
That flax-o-meal is GREAT!! Thanks for the awesome tip!
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Glad you figured that out, since I just realized it actually used the tags and didn't show them...duh...
Don't feel too bad.. It was monday, ya know?
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Thanks bud! I stumbled into the "pre /pre" earlier and
got it to work reasonably well :grin:
:cool: TJ :cool:
The browsers do that automatically. English rules were changed a while back so that the double space after period is no longer correct, and browsers were made to fit that new rule.You can use %nbsp as a space character, but I'm not sure if browsers will respect that or not. You could use the
and
tags at the start and end of a section of text, and then the browser will display it exactly as typed (carriage returns, tabs, etc). -
moving it upwards :wink:
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
How do you post formatted text without losing the extra spaces?
Seems like the forum software extracts consecutive space
characters..
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
> Chompie's
Hey, isn't that guy a user on this forum?
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
The pilot screw resembles a "D" try a .22 or .17 rimfire shell empty of course with a dent in it, or tweezers.
Just get out your dremel tool and slot the pilot screw. Then
you can turn it with a straight-head screwdriver..
(makes it much easier to get accurate turn counts)
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Hey TJ, have you tried that Flax-o-meal hot cereal?
Nope! But boy howdy, that sounds good! I'll have to check it
out. Thanks bunches for the tip! (used to love oatmeal)
Another question,Shoot!
when buying Flax seed oil, I noticed some stores have it refrigerated and some dont, and this happens with the same brand of products. From what I understand it is somthing that should be refrigerated, am I wrong?Yes, it should always be refrgerated. In fact, I stick it in the
freezer when I get it home. (it won't freeze solid, it's too unsaturated.)
I never buy flax seed oil unless it's kept cold and is in a totally
pitch-black container (not see through). Light and heat can denature
the oil and ruin it.
"Barleans" is my brand of choice around here. It's cheap, cold
pressed and packaged properly.
Make sure you open the bottle at the grocery store and take a
taste of it before you buy. That way you don't go home with
a rancid bottle (tastes fishy)
If they complain, tell them you're buying it if it's fresh, and
helping them to remove a bad product if it's rancid :wink:
:cool: TJ :cool:
-
Not sure if its just coincidence or not, but I started squirting flax-seed oil into my meals...
Not a coincidence bud. The omega-3's in the oil are helping you.
You'll get even better results if you mix the tablespoon of flax oil
with 1/4 cup of cottage cheese and consume it on an empty stomach.
(anti-cancer, anti-viral Budwig approach)
:cool: TJ :cool:
Throttle hold! recommendations
in The Garage
Posted
From best to worst:
1) Throttlemeister
2) Nep CC-3
3) Vista Cruise
:cool: TJ :cool: